2022
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2021.0288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status and prospects for drought forecasting: opportunities in artificial intelligence and hybrid physical–statistical forecasting

Abstract: Despite major improvements in weather and climate modelling and substantial increases in remotely sensed observations, drought prediction remains a major challenge. After a review of the existing methods, we discuss major research gaps and opportunities to improve drought prediction. We argue that current approaches are top-down, assuming that the process(es) and/or driver(s) are known—i.e. starting with a model and then imposing it on the observed events (reality). With the help of an experiment, we show that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Substantial progress has been made in hydro‐climatic forecasting of droughts, with advancements in detection, causation, prediction, and climate change attribution (AghaKouchak et al, 2022; Fung et al, 2020; Sutanto, Wetterhall, et al, 2020a). However, the gap between predicting drought as a hydro‐meteorological event and understanding its real‐world impact on the society and the economy hinders effective response measures (WMO, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substantial progress has been made in hydro‐climatic forecasting of droughts, with advancements in detection, causation, prediction, and climate change attribution (AghaKouchak et al, 2022; Fung et al, 2020; Sutanto, Wetterhall, et al, 2020a). However, the gap between predicting drought as a hydro‐meteorological event and understanding its real‐world impact on the society and the economy hinders effective response measures (WMO, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most operational flood forecasts are produced by forcing a conceptual or physics-based hydrological model with dynamical daily or sub-daily climate inputs (Emerton et al, 2016). Statistical-dynamical, or hybrid, methods present an attractive alternative approach to produce streamflow forecasts, as they avoid the need to run an offline land model and benefit from advances in statistical modeling (AghaKouchak et al, 2022;Slater et al, 2022). Streamflow quantiles are predicted using statistical or machine-learning models driven by dynamical weather or climate predictions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This themed issue documents important scientific advances that are improving understandings of droughts and the evidence needed for drought management. There have been rapid advances in drought forecasting, which are documented in the paper by AghaKouchak et al (Status and prospects for drought forecasting: opportunities in artificial intelligence and hybrid physicalstatistical forecasting) [12]. These advances have been enabled by a combination of new data sources, in particular from satellite Earth observation, and increasingly powerful methods to analyse these vast datasets, notably with machine learning (also employed by Marvel et al [5] for analysis of climate data) and artificial intelligence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These advances have been enabled by a combination of new data sources, in particular from satellite Earth observation, and increasingly powerful methods to analyse these vast datasets, notably with machine learning (also employed by Marvel et al [5] for analysis of climate data) and artificial intelligence. AghaKouchak et al [12] demonstrate how physical insights can help to constrain and improve the performance of data-based methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation