2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1096-4959(02)00167-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status and opportunities for genomics research with rainbow trout

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
130
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 278 publications
1
130
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Partial genome data exist for many others, including several species directly relevant to ecotoxicology (e.g., rainbow trout [9], Japanese medaka [10], fathead minnow [11], Xenopus sp. [12], Daphnia pulex [13]).…”
Section: Genomic Methods and Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial genome data exist for many others, including several species directly relevant to ecotoxicology (e.g., rainbow trout [9], Japanese medaka [10], fathead minnow [11], Xenopus sp. [12], Daphnia pulex [13]).…”
Section: Genomic Methods and Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the rainbow trout is not only studied with regard to its economical interest but is also a model for more fundamental research in carcinogenesis, toxicology, comparative immunology, physiology and others (Thorgaard et al, 2002). Several topics are investigated in parallel in different species.…”
Section: Principal Teleost Fish Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salmonid fish of the genera Oncorhynchus and Salmo attract the attention of both researchers and the general public, on account of their biological characteristics and wide use in sport and recreational fishing, aquaculture, and research (see examples in Thorgaard et al 2002). Salmonids are particularly known for their extensive genetic and life-history variation, resulting in part from their homing ability during spawning, with localized sub-populations being adapted to different sites and environments within a river system (Dittman and Quinn 1996;Garcia de Leaniz et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%