2018
DOI: 10.1037/bar0000113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status and future directions of preclinical behavioral pharmacology in tobacco regulatory science.

Abstract: Behavioral pharmacology is a branch of the experimental analysis of behavior that has had great influence in drug addiction research and policy. This paper provides an overview of recent behavioral pharmacology research in the field of tobacco regulatory science, which provides the scientific foundation for the Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products (FDA CTP) to set tobacco control policies. The rationale and aims of tobacco regulatory science are provided, including the types of preclinical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
(270 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), cigarette smoke (CS) contains considerably higher levels of several behaviorally active non-nicotine constituents including monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors (e.g., the β-carbolines harmane and norharmane, also called harman and norharman), minor tobacco alkaloids (e.g., nornicotine, anabasine), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (e.g., acetaldehyde, toluene) (e.g., Margham et al, 2016 ; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2018 ; Belushkin et al, 2020 ). These compounds can mimic or enhance nicotine’s addiction-related effects in preclinical models, or may have abuse liability themselves (for review, see Hoffman and Evans, 2013 ; LeSage et al, 2018 ). The greater abuse liability of cigarettes versus ANDs may therefore reflect the higher levels of MAO inhibitors and other behaviorally active non-nicotine constituents in CS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), cigarette smoke (CS) contains considerably higher levels of several behaviorally active non-nicotine constituents including monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors (e.g., the β-carbolines harmane and norharmane, also called harman and norharman), minor tobacco alkaloids (e.g., nornicotine, anabasine), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (e.g., acetaldehyde, toluene) (e.g., Margham et al, 2016 ; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2018 ; Belushkin et al, 2020 ). These compounds can mimic or enhance nicotine’s addiction-related effects in preclinical models, or may have abuse liability themselves (for review, see Hoffman and Evans, 2013 ; LeSage et al, 2018 ). The greater abuse liability of cigarettes versus ANDs may therefore reflect the higher levels of MAO inhibitors and other behaviorally active non-nicotine constituents in CS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preclinical models and human studies have demonstrated that nicotine has cognitive-enhancing effects and these effects of nicotine may be an important factor in vulnerability to Tobacco Use Disorder (TUD) and may also contribute to difficulty in quitting smoking. The positive reinforcement effects of nicotine reflect nicotine's inherently rewarding effects that increase the probability of continued self-administration, and for both, the initiation and maintenance of tobacco use (1)(2)(3). Preclinical models typically used cell cultures or animal models that involve administration of nicotine to rodents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nicotine is the primary addictive constituent in tobacco products, but other tobacco constituents may also contribute to tobacco use (e.g., Brennan et al, 2014;Hoffman and Evans, 2013;LeSage et al, 2018). For example, cigarette smoke contains various compounds (e.g., β-carbolines, 2-naphthylamine) that inhibit monoamine oxidase (MAO), an enzyme that degrades monoamines (e.g., dopamine, serotonin), and both isozymes of MAO (MAO-A and MAO-B) are inhibited in smokers (Fowler et al, 1996a;Fowler et al, 1996b;Hogg, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%