2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stature estimation based on tibial length in different stature groups of Spanish males

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies based on intralimb proportions have reported that both the forearm (radius and ulna) and the lower leg (tibia and fibula) are more variable than the proximal segments of the limbs (Holliday & Ruff, 2001). Moreover, studies focused on tibial length in different stature groups have reported that relative tibia length is greater in taller groups among both males and females (Duyar & Pelin, 2003;Saco-Ledo et al, 2019. In the present study, brachial index did not differ between stature groups in either males or females, while the crural index and relative tibial length tended to be greater in taller female and especially male groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies based on intralimb proportions have reported that both the forearm (radius and ulna) and the lower leg (tibia and fibula) are more variable than the proximal segments of the limbs (Holliday & Ruff, 2001). Moreover, studies focused on tibial length in different stature groups have reported that relative tibia length is greater in taller groups among both males and females (Duyar & Pelin, 2003;Saco-Ledo et al, 2019. In the present study, brachial index did not differ between stature groups in either males or females, while the crural index and relative tibial length tended to be greater in taller female and especially male groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, some other studies were performed to investigate reliable stature formulae according to long bone length. It had been understood that stature equations differ based on various factors such as gender, ethnic group, and study methods (19)(20)(21)(22). Madden et al (2012) claimed that their formula for assessing the height based on the length of ulna correlated closely with the actual height in white participants, while it had failed to provide an accurate assessment of the actual height in black and Asian participants (4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body mass was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using a calibrated analog floor-scale (Model 762; Seca, Germany); stretch stature was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a portable stadiometer (Model 213; Seca; Germany) according to the procedures described by the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (Marfell-Jones et al, 2012 ). The tibial length was estimated using validated regression equations based on stature (Saco-Ledo et al, 2019 ). Skeletal muscle architecture of the GL and GM muscles at rest was measured using 2-dimensional B-mode ultrasound (LOGIQ V2; GE Healthcare, Australia), with a 38 mm wide linear probe and a standardized frequency of 12–13 MHz.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%