2018
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistics versus machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
688
0
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 991 publications
(776 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
688
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Inference and prediction are two sides of a coin when inquiring human health and disease (1)(2)(3). Let's take diabetes mellitus as a motivating example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inference and prediction are two sides of a coin when inquiring human health and disease (1)(2)(3). Let's take diabetes mellitus as a motivating example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The feasibility of ML has been demonstrated previously in the CAD risk stratification field. 7 Moreover, these alterations were associated with reductions in occurrence of non-fatal MI's.…”
Section: Machine Learning To Improve Integration Of Coronary Plaque Amentioning
confidence: 89%
“…3,8,9 Plaque information derived during CCTA acquisition and subsequently classified according to the 16-segment coronary tree model is typically integrated into a single score, assuming linear relationships between CAD extent and risk. 10 Machine learning (ML) is a field in computer science that uses algorithms to combine a big data in order to optimize prediction. Previous studies have demonstrated that ML can increase predictive value for death and myocardial ischemia compared to conventional scores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many statistical methods are limited in their ability to sort through large numbers of predictors (14). Data mining using machine learning, which is particularly well suited for identifying predictive factors among thousands of variables (15,16), has successfully identified predictor variables for a diverse set of outcomes (17)(18)(19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%