2000
DOI: 10.1177/0049124100028003001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistics of Ordinal Variation

Abstract: Whereas measures of variation in nominal data have long been recognized and used by sociologists, measures of variation for ordered categorical data have received little attention. The authors discuss the potential usefulness of ordinal dispersion statistics in sociology and define a broad class of such measures, some of which have previously been proposed in other forms. This article focuses on two statistics, termed l2 and l, which are [0 - 1] normed measures of concentration or dispersion, and illustrates t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We first follow suggestions of Blair and Lacy (2000) to consider the observed distributions N ¼ ðN 1 ; . .…”
Section: The Families Of Polarization Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We first follow suggestions of Blair and Lacy (2000) to consider the observed distributions N ¼ ðN 1 ; . .…”
Section: The Families Of Polarization Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use a formula given by Agresti (1990) which is presented in Blair and Lacy (2000) for statistical inference. Using the multivariate delta method, we find that the sample estimator for the variance of P 2 ; which will be used to compute confidence intervals for P 2 ; is: …”
Section: Statistical Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of a sensitivity analysis, Panel C takes into account the ordinal nature of the job satisfaction variable. That is, because satisfaction is not a cardinal variable, the variance may not be the best measure of dispersion, because it imposes a supraordinal assumption about the nature of the continuum underlying the different categories (Blair and Lacy (2000)). Therefore, in Panel C I use an index for ordinal variation based on Berry and Mielke (1992) to calculate s. It appears that the results are not much different from those in Panel A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous modifications of Leik's measure of dispersion have been published. In [24][25][26][27][28][29], the authors implicitly used φ(u) = 1/4 − (u − 1/2) 2 or equivalently φ(u) = u(1 − u). Most of the discussion was conducted in the journal "Perceptual and Motor Skills".…”
Section: Theory Of Dispersionmentioning
confidence: 99%