2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw3139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistics of interpulse radio pulsars: the key to solving the alignment/counter-alignment problem

Abstract: At present, there are theoretical models of radio pulsar evolution which predict both the alignment, i.e., evolution of inclination angle χ between magnetic and rotational axes to 0 • , and its counter-alignment, i.e., evolution to 90 • . At the same time, both models well describe the pulsar distribution on P -Ṗ diagram. For this reason, up to now it was impossible to determine the braking mechanisms since it was rather difficult to estimate inclination angle evolution on the basis of observation. In this pap… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remember that according to Arzamasskiy et al (2017) within MHD model the distribution function NMHD(P, χ) (47) reproduces good enough the number of both aligned and orthogonal interpulse pulsars. In particular, the number of orthogonal pulsars in the range 0.03 s < P < 0.5 s is 18 ÷ 40, in good agreement with observations (see Table 1).…”
Section: Approximately Orthogonal Pulsarsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remember that according to Arzamasskiy et al (2017) within MHD model the distribution function NMHD(P, χ) (47) reproduces good enough the number of both aligned and orthogonal interpulse pulsars. In particular, the number of orthogonal pulsars in the range 0.03 s < P < 0.5 s is 18 ÷ 40, in good agreement with observations (see Table 1).…”
Section: Approximately Orthogonal Pulsarsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The analysis produced by Arzamasskiy et al (2017) have shown that the number of observable interpulse pulsars with χ ≈ 0 • can be explained within both BGI (counteralignment) and MHD (alignment) models due to considerable uncertainties in the initial pulsar distribution Q(P, χ). In turn, this approach gave us the possibility to evaluate birth functions QP (P ) and Qχ(χ) on pulsar initial periods 1 In Table 1 we use the normalization for the total number of pulsars in the corresponding range of pulsar periods P .…”
Section: Kinetic Equation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…models of pulsar evolution predict both the alignment and counter-alignment of the magnetic and rotational axes but neither of these two possibilities has been convincingly justified by observations (see e.g. Arzamasskiy et al 2017, and references therein). We cannot discern between the two cases either.…”
Section: Spectra Of J0633 and Its Pwnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the velocity of the resulting neutron star can differ significantly from the velocity of nearby stars. Therefore, a significant part of the pulsars is distributed in a disk that is about 3 times thicker than the disk of stars (Payne-Gaposchkin 1979; Arzamasskiy et al 2017).…”
Section: Other Features Of Relict Neutron Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%