2007
DOI: 10.1134/s1063771007060115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistics of caustics in an underwater sound channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such systems, the consecutive effect of weak scattering events that are correlated in space leads to strong focusing in branch-like patterns, connected to the formation of random caustics, which are regions where the flow is focused. Examples of this phenomenon include the random focusing of electrons in semiconductors [8,[21][22][23][24] and microwaves propagating in cavities with weak scatterers [9], as shown in Fig.1.2, and it is considered to explain the twinkling of starlight due to its propagation through the slightly inhomogeneous atmosphere [25][26][27][28][29], as well as the focusing of sound waves in the ocean due to water density variations [30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. All those phenomena can be modeled using Schrödinger-type equations, which can then be studied using Hamiltonian rays.…”
Section: 0mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In such systems, the consecutive effect of weak scattering events that are correlated in space leads to strong focusing in branch-like patterns, connected to the formation of random caustics, which are regions where the flow is focused. Examples of this phenomenon include the random focusing of electrons in semiconductors [8,[21][22][23][24] and microwaves propagating in cavities with weak scatterers [9], as shown in Fig.1.2, and it is considered to explain the twinkling of starlight due to its propagation through the slightly inhomogeneous atmosphere [25][26][27][28][29], as well as the focusing of sound waves in the ocean due to water density variations [30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. All those phenomena can be modeled using Schrödinger-type equations, which can then be studied using Hamiltonian rays.…”
Section: 0mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) i and the diffusion coefficients D (2) ij are generally given by [55] 36) where once again the summation convention applies. In our case, the coefficients are…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of this phenomenon include the random focusing of electrons in semiconductors [8,[21][22][23][24] and microwaves propagating in cavities with weak scatterers [9], as shown in Fig. 1.2, and it is considered to explain the twinkling of starlight due to its propagation through the slightly inhomogeneous atmosphere [25][26][27][28][29], as well as the focusing of sound waves in the ocean due to water density variations [30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. All those phenomena can be modeled using Schrödinger-type equations, which can then be studied using Hamiltonian rays.…”
Section: 0mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, even minute perturbations can quickly lead to drastic effects -a clear hint that the equations describing this phenomenon are nonlinear. There are many examples of this random focusing: The twinkling of starlight which propagates through the slightly inhomogeneous atmosphere [23][24][25][26][27] or light in an optical fibre focused by small perturbations [28], freak waves in the ocean which can even appear in calm seas and without an additional focusing mechanism such as an underwater island but just by small fluctuations in the wave velocity [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], the focusing of sound waves in the ocean because of the fluc- tuating water density [38][39][40][41][42][43][44], and the random focusing of electrons in semiconductor devices because of a random disorder potential created by donor atoms [45][46][47], which can drastically alter the transport properties of such devices. Random caustics have also been described as a mechanism for the activation of rainshowers [48], and have recently been observed in microwave cavities [49].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%