2017
DOI: 10.1080/2150704x.2017.1335907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistically homogeneous pixel selection for small SAR data sets based on the similarity test of the covariance matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the so called clutter diversity, the inference task becomes challenging since the statistical properties of the disturbance can change among the different nodes and polarizations [13]- [25]. In this respect, in [25] a statistical analysis of multistatic/polarimetric sea-clutter returns collected via the Netted RADar (NetRAD) system highlighted that, over an appropriate time interval (referred to as the coherence time), the sea-clutter returns collected from both monostatic and bistatic sensors can be modelled according to a Spherically Invariant Random Process (SIRP) [26]- [33]. This is tantamount to describing the clutter backscattering over the coherence time as the product of a nonnegative random variable and a zeromean circularly symmetric Gaussian process with unknown spectral characteristics, referred to as texture and speckle, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the so called clutter diversity, the inference task becomes challenging since the statistical properties of the disturbance can change among the different nodes and polarizations [13]- [25]. In this respect, in [25] a statistical analysis of multistatic/polarimetric sea-clutter returns collected via the Netted RADar (NetRAD) system highlighted that, over an appropriate time interval (referred to as the coherence time), the sea-clutter returns collected from both monostatic and bistatic sensors can be modelled according to a Spherically Invariant Random Process (SIRP) [26]- [33]. This is tantamount to describing the clutter backscattering over the coherence time as the product of a nonnegative random variable and a zeromean circularly symmetric Gaussian process with unknown spectral characteristics, referred to as texture and speckle, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars have done a series of related research on the extraction of SHP [26][27][28][29]. Parizzi et al [30] compared and analyzed the Kullback-Leibler divergence, the KS test, the Anderson-Darling (AD) test and generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful application of DS requires statistically homogeneous pixel (SHP) identification and phase optimization. Existing methods for SHP identification employ the two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test [15], mean amplitude and mean amplitude difference [16], polarimetry information [17], confidence interval based on the central limit theorem [18], one-sample test [19], similarity test of the covariance matrix [20], geometric distance and target features [21], various amplitude statistics [22], and nonlocal filters [23], [24]. Most of these methods can effectively solve the problem of SHP identification although they differ in terms of their efficiency and robustness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%