2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2015.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistically-driven 3D fiber reconstruction and denoising from multi-slice cardiac DTI using a Markov random field model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiment was carried out on real data, and the denoising performance of the proposed approach was robust. Lekadir, et al [66] developed a denoising and fiber reconstruction method for multi-slice cardiac diffusion tensor images (DTIs) based on MRF. The MRF was combined with a statistical constraint for missing fiber and a consistency term to enable the obtained meshes continuous.…”
Section: Markov Random Field Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment was carried out on real data, and the denoising performance of the proposed approach was robust. Lekadir, et al [66] developed a denoising and fiber reconstruction method for multi-slice cardiac diffusion tensor images (DTIs) based on MRF. The MRF was combined with a statistical constraint for missing fiber and a consistency term to enable the obtained meshes continuous.…”
Section: Markov Random Field Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches do not use specific diffusion measures of the specific heart, and rely on potential correlations of the shape and the fibers field. However, later in (Lekadir et al, 2016), the authors introduced a way to additionally take advantage of multi-slice diffusion data measured on a specific patient.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is important to remark that these family of algorithms need user interaction for the definition of a number of free parameters (e.g. six in (Lekadir et al, 2016)).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%