2014
DOI: 10.1117/12.2048204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical x-ray computed tomography imaging from photon-starved measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the quadratic-penalty case, the regularization parameter α was 2 −14 ; in the Huber-penalty case, α = 2 28 . In both cases, the elements of the weighting matrix W corresponded to the CT scanner’s estimate of the inverse of the variance of each ray given the scanner-specific corrections used [29]. Given that we have several repeated scans of the same object, we computed the empirical variance of the observations y from this data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the quadratic-penalty case, the regularization parameter α was 2 −14 ; in the Huber-penalty case, α = 2 28 . In both cases, the elements of the weighting matrix W corresponded to the CT scanner’s estimate of the inverse of the variance of each ray given the scanner-specific corrections used [29]. Given that we have several repeated scans of the same object, we computed the empirical variance of the observations y from this data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tube current and tube voltage of the X-ray source are 750 mA and 120 kVp, respectively. We started from a smoothed FBP image x (0) and tuned the statistical weights [36] and the q -generalized Gaussian MRF regularization parameters [33] to emulate the MBIR method [3, 37]. We used 10 subsets for the relaxed OS-LALM, while [11, Eqn.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Directly using y i to compute W i causes strong statistical correlation between W i and p i . In practice, smoothed or de-noised data can be used instead [38][31][36][32]. As an example, we implement a locally adaptive linear minimum mean squared-error (LLMMSE) filter very similar to what proposed by Chang, Zhang, Thibault, et al [78], where denoised data ӯ i , p̄ i and W̄ i , are used instead of the noisy data y i , p i , and W i .…”
Section: Statistical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These non-positive values must be either zero-weighted [30], replaced by some artificial positive values [17], corrected by some recursive mean-preserving operations [31], or interpolated by some sinogram smoothing or denoising methods [6], [32]–[35]. For example, Chang, Zhang, and Thibault [36] proposed a Bayesian inference method to map non-positive transmission measurements to positive values. However, when the extent of such pre-correction is aggressive, such as in ultra-low-dose CT, bias could be introduced in the reconstructed image and spatial resolution could be degraded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation