2006
DOI: 10.1029/2005jd006154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical uncertainty of eddy flux–based estimates of gross ecosystem carbon exchange at Howland Forest, Maine

Abstract: [1] We present an uncertainty analysis of gross ecosystem carbon exchange (GEE) estimates derived from 7 years of continuous eddy covariance measurements of forestatmosphere CO 2 fluxes at Howland Forest, Maine, USA. These data, which have high temporal resolution, can be used to validate process modeling analyses, remote sensing assessments, and field surveys. However, separation of tower-based net ecosystem exchange (NEE) into its components (respiration losses and photosynthetic uptake) requires at least on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Tables 1 and 2, the number of EC stations becomes very large if it is necessary to detect very small seepage rates at large amplification factors () above background fluxes. Note that the number of EC towers in Tables 1 and 2 as low as 2.7 mol CO 2 m -2 s -1 (10 mol C m -2 s -1 ) above background respiration CO 2 exchanges (Miles et al, 2005;Hagen et al, 2006). Finally, the numbers derived in this analysis should be considered valid only in an order-of-magnitude sense and subject to change depending on local site-specific properties and processes.…”
Section: Spatial Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Tables 1 and 2, the number of EC stations becomes very large if it is necessary to detect very small seepage rates at large amplification factors () above background fluxes. Note that the number of EC towers in Tables 1 and 2 as low as 2.7 mol CO 2 m -2 s -1 (10 mol C m -2 s -1 ) above background respiration CO 2 exchanges (Miles et al, 2005;Hagen et al, 2006). Finally, the numbers derived in this analysis should be considered valid only in an order-of-magnitude sense and subject to change depending on local site-specific properties and processes.…”
Section: Spatial Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, ANNs have found widespread application in the hydrological literature, especially as regression tools (Govindaraju and Rao, 2000). ANNs have also been used to build a model for water vapor and carbon exchange in a forest ecosystem, which does not require a detailed knowledge of tree physiology (Hagen et al, 2006).…”
Section: Artificial Neural Network Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation was repeated 2000 times and the uncertainty of the measured annual NEP or ET were estimated by calculating the 90% prediction limits or standard deviation of all simulated annual flux values. Similarly, the random uncertainties for annual GEP and TER were evaluated following a Monte Carlo algorithm detailed by Hagen et al (2006). The algorithm infers the statistical properties of the random error from the residuals of the model for gap-filling and flux partitioning.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five eddy flux sites with high quality of data are selected in this study, covering the major representative PFTs over the conterminous U.S. (Table 1). Specifically, Howland Forest main (45.20N, 68.74W) (Hagen et al 2006.17 W) (Urbanski et al 2007, van Gorsel et al 2009.95 W) (Baldocchi et al 2004, Baldocchi et al 2005, Lost Creek (46.08 N, 89.98 W) (Yuan et al 2007, Sulman et al 2009) and UCI_1850 (55.88 N, 98.48 W) (Bond-Lamberty et al 2005, Goulden et al 2011) are used to parameterize for temperate coniferous forest, temperate deciduous forest, grassland, shrub land, and boreal forest, respectively. The optimal parameters are extrapolated to the conterminous United States.…”
Section: Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (Tem) and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Using site-level Ameriflux data (Baldocchi et al 2004, Bond-Lamberty et al 2005, Hagen et al 2006, Urbanski et al 2007, Sulman et al 2009) to parameterize TEM for each PFT and extrapolate the optimal parameters to the region; (2) Using MODIS GPP product (Running et al 2004, Zhao et al 2005, Heinsch et al 2006, Zhao et al 2006, Mu et al 2007) to parameterize TEM for each grid cell (0.58 by 0.58) and use parameters to simulate the carbon budget over the conterminous U.S. Both methods are based on a welldeveloped adjoint version of TEM (Q. Zhu and Q. Zhuang, unpublished manuscript).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%