“…This method is 95 pct successful in predicting the sign of ⌬H ij . [4] A comparison of the available values of ⌬H ij for 40 binary systems formed by Al, Ti, Hf, Cr, Fe, Co, Ni, Nb, Mo, and W with the calculated values by the Miedema et al method shows that the differences generally do not exceed 8 kJ/g atom, the largest difference being 17 kJ/g atom within a range of ϩ47 to Ϫ62 kJ/g atom for ⌬H ij . [4] In our previous publications, [5][6][7][8] on the basis of Miedema et al's methods and assuming the excess entropy as zero, the thermodynamic models of the activity coefficient of a solute at infinite dilution, expressed in ln , and the first-0 ␥ i and second-order interaction parameters, and , ,…”