2012
DOI: 10.5923/j.ijmc.20120203.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Thermodynamic Analysis for Isothermal Hydrogenation Performances of Mg<SUB>2-</SUB><SUB>y</SUB>Pr<SUB>y</SUB>Ni<SUB>4</SUB>Intermetallics (<i>y</i> = 0.6, 0.8, 1.0)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical thermodynamic analysis procedures were comprehensively summarized by Fowler Statistical thermodynamic parameters evaluated for extensive range of interstitial non-stoichiometric compounds including hydride, carbide, nitride, phosphide and sulfide were compiled in a monograph published by the author [2] that included calculation results reported by 2012 [3]- [46]. All these analyses [2]- [48] were made accepting an a priori assumption of constant interaction energy ( ) E X X − between nearest-neighbour interstitial atoms X within a homogeneity composition range of MX x lattice at arbitrary T. Parameter values estimated for M's in the same group in the Periodic Table of the Elements for given X were comparable to each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical thermodynamic analysis procedures were comprehensively summarized by Fowler Statistical thermodynamic parameters evaluated for extensive range of interstitial non-stoichiometric compounds including hydride, carbide, nitride, phosphide and sulfide were compiled in a monograph published by the author [2] that included calculation results reported by 2012 [3]- [46]. All these analyses [2]- [48] were made accepting an a priori assumption of constant interaction energy ( ) E X X − between nearest-neighbour interstitial atoms X within a homogeneity composition range of MX x lattice at arbitrary T. Parameter values estimated for M's in the same group in the Periodic Table of the Elements for given X were comparable to each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%