2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-7161(03)23013-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Tests of the Equality of Survival Curves: Reconsidering the Options

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And between the two, the best choice for is the Peto-Peto weight function with no time lag (W pq (t i )), as it has the least variation in p-values across all the tested weight combinations. This turns out to be the same conclusion that Gaugler et al (2007) (Figure 12) we can observe that the weight functions behave dierently than when we use the full data-set, and look very much like the similar weight functions studied in Gaugler et al (2007), Suciu et al (2003), or Klein and Moeschberger (2003), conrming that the our data subset has corrected for the bias in the PL estimator and behaves much more the typical right-censored data set. The session we will be running today has 60 rounds.…”
Section: Appendix B: Data Flippingsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…And between the two, the best choice for is the Peto-Peto weight function with no time lag (W pq (t i )), as it has the least variation in p-values across all the tested weight combinations. This turns out to be the same conclusion that Gaugler et al (2007) (Figure 12) we can observe that the weight functions behave dierently than when we use the full data-set, and look very much like the similar weight functions studied in Gaugler et al (2007), Suciu et al (2003), or Klein and Moeschberger (2003), conrming that the our data subset has corrected for the bias in the PL estimator and behaves much more the typical right-censored data set. The session we will be running today has 60 rounds.…”
Section: Appendix B: Data Flippingsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Yet Fleming et al (1980) show that this test is not appropriate when the proportional hazards assumption is not satised 19 , or when there is heavy data censoring. Because the hazard functions of our two treatments cross, and because of the heavy right-hand censoring of our data 20 , we cannot use the logrank test, leaving us with no systematic way to decide which are the best weights for our data analysis (Suciu et al (2003)). …”
Section: Hazard Rates and The Product Limit Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…relapse, or death). The simple Cox proportional hazards models were also use to estimate the crude hazard ratios (HR) along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals and the Wald test for significance (Suciu et al, 2004). The multivariate section consisted in the analysis of all prognostic factors significant at 0.25 level in the univariate analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%