Comprehensive Composite Materials 2000
DOI: 10.1016/b0-08-042993-9/00056-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Strength Theory for Fibrous Composite Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
92
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
1
92
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, we assume that load is transferred from the ductile phase back to broken elements of the brittle phase via an interfacial shear stress that equals the instantaneous average flow stress of the ductile phase in shear. This differentiates the present model from global load sharing models that have been proposed so far in the literature for brittle/ductile phase composites [16][17][18][19] because here the intact, ductile, phase hardens as it flows. Both the load it carries and the load it transmits to the brittle phase, wherever the latter has fractured, therefore increase as the composite deforms: we examine here how this influences ductile failure of the composite (or, in the parlance of composite mechanics, its failure by global load sharing [16,17]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…More specifically, we assume that load is transferred from the ductile phase back to broken elements of the brittle phase via an interfacial shear stress that equals the instantaneous average flow stress of the ductile phase in shear. This differentiates the present model from global load sharing models that have been proposed so far in the literature for brittle/ductile phase composites [16][17][18][19] because here the intact, ductile, phase hardens as it flows. Both the load it carries and the load it transmits to the brittle phase, wherever the latter has fractured, therefore increase as the composite deforms: we examine here how this influences ductile failure of the composite (or, in the parlance of composite mechanics, its failure by global load sharing [16,17]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This differentiates the present model from global load sharing models that have been proposed so far in the literature for brittle/ductile phase composites [16][17][18][19] because here the intact, ductile, phase hardens as it flows. Both the load it carries and the load it transmits to the brittle phase, wherever the latter has fractured, therefore increase as the composite deforms: we examine here how this influences ductile failure of the composite (or, in the parlance of composite mechanics, its failure by global load sharing [16,17]). As will be seen, one finds that despite the many parameters needed to describe this two-phase system, in the end only two dimensionless parameters influence significantly its strain to failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Examples of such modelling include but not limited to modelling of laminated woven composites under quasi-static tension 2,3 and high strain rate compaction, 4 composites with braided reinforcement 5 and 3D composites. 6 However, the conventional unit cell approach cannot predict variability of the mechanical properties from sample to sample which is usually associated with variability in the intrinsic properties of constituents 7,8 and the geometry of reinforcements such as yarn and layer misalignments 9 arising from textile and composite manufacturing. This study focuses only on the effects of variability of textile reinforcement geometry, namely yarn paths and layer shift variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%