2022
DOI: 10.1007/jhep02(2022)055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical significance of the sterile-neutrino hypothesis in the context of reactor and gallium data

Abstract: We evaluate the statistical significance of the 3+1 sterile-neutrino hypothesis using νe and $$ \overline{\nu} $$ ν ¯ e disappearance data from reactor, solar and gallium radioactive source experiments. Concerning the latter, we investigate the implications of the recent BEST results. For reactor data we focus on relative measurements independent of flux predictions. For the problem at hand, the usual χ2-approximation… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(183 reference statements)
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the 90% CL upper bound (GS98 solar model) implies sin 2 2θ 14 0.07, which is in conflict with the full 2σ region reported by the Neutrino-4 experiment [16]. A combined analysis of solar and reactor neutrino data will be presented in a forthcoming publication [56], which will provide a quantitative assessment of the impact of solar neutrino data on possible hints from reactor experiments.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In particular, the 90% CL upper bound (GS98 solar model) implies sin 2 2θ 14 0.07, which is in conflict with the full 2σ region reported by the Neutrino-4 experiment [16]. A combined analysis of solar and reactor neutrino data will be presented in a forthcoming publication [56], which will provide a quantitative assessment of the impact of solar neutrino data on possible hints from reactor experiments.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, the reactor antineutrino anomaly has been revised and reduced recently [52,53]. On the other hand, the Gallium anomaly has been reinforced by the recent results of the BEST experiment [55], but it is in tension with the reactor data [53], with the negative results of the DANSS [108], PROSPECT [109], and STEREO [110] experiments [56], and with the solar bound [53,57,111]. Considering the SBL ν µ → ν e appearance channel, the MiniBooNE low-energy anomaly [39,40] has been recently disfavored by the results of the MicroBooNE experiment [58][59][60] (see, however, the caveats in Ref.…”
Section: Comparison With Sbl Neutrino Oscillation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[54], has been recently revived by the result of the BEST experiment [55] (see also the discussions in Refs. [53,56,57]). Considering the ν µ → ν e appearance channel, the new results of the MicroBooNE experiment [58][59][60] disfavour the sterile neutrino interpretation of the MiniBooNE anomaly as an electron neutrino appearance from a muon neutrino beam (see, however, the discussion in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ν e → ν e has now been updated by the data collected by BEST [49], which strongly favors rather large mixing angle and masses larger than 1 eV 2 . Concerning the reactor anomalies, a recent reevaluation of the neutrino fluxes [50] has led to new global analyses [51,52] showing that combined reactor data are consistent with no sterile-neutrino oscillations. Despite the recent progress in all oscillation channels, new experimental data is still needed to fully assess the sterile neutrino option.…”
Section: A Active-sterile Neutrino Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%