2003
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-4-62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical significance for hierarchical clustering in genetic association and microarray expression studies

Abstract: Background: With the increasing amount of data generated in molecular genetics laboratories, it is often difficult to make sense of results because of the vast number of different outcomes or variables studied. Examples include expression levels for large numbers of genes and haplotypes at large numbers of loci. It is then natural to group observations into smaller numbers of classes that allow for an easier overview and interpretation of the data. This grouping is often carried out in multiple steps with the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our method differs substantially from the approach of “bootstrap p -values” implemented in the R package pvclust (Suzuki and Shimodaira, 2006 ), that provides a level of significance for each clade of the dendrogram. Similar approaches to detect the significance levels of each individual cluster have been proposed in (Levenstien et al, 2003 ; Park et al, 2009 ). Our approach provides a simple heuristic to decide whether there are clusters, and where to cut the dendrogram to detect these clusters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our method differs substantially from the approach of “bootstrap p -values” implemented in the R package pvclust (Suzuki and Shimodaira, 2006 ), that provides a level of significance for each clade of the dendrogram. Similar approaches to detect the significance levels of each individual cluster have been proposed in (Levenstien et al, 2003 ; Park et al, 2009 ). Our approach provides a simple heuristic to decide whether there are clusters, and where to cut the dendrogram to detect these clusters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Complementary, more robust clustering approaches could be used [e.g. ( Gesteira Costa Filho, 2008 ; Levenstien et al , 2003 )] to enhance the robustness of RAmPART. Alternatively, instead of using region-based proposal densities, Hamiltonian Monte–Carlo methods ( Graham and Storkey, 2017 ; Hoffman and Gelman, 2014 ) might be employed for the different temperatures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%