1989
DOI: 10.2307/2290095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
1,430
5
57

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6,422 publications
(1,518 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
26
1,430
5
57
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Cohen (1988), eta squared in the repeated-measures ANOVA and Cohen's d as a measure of effect sizes (small effect = 0.1-0.3; moderate or intermediate effect = 0.3-0.5; large effect = > 0.5) in paired-sample t-tests were estimated, in addition to t-test comparisons between groups.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Cohen (1988), eta squared in the repeated-measures ANOVA and Cohen's d as a measure of effect sizes (small effect = 0.1-0.3; moderate or intermediate effect = 0.3-0.5; large effect = > 0.5) in paired-sample t-tests were estimated, in addition to t-test comparisons between groups.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution analysis of 297 HRV effect sizes from between-group/case-control studies performed by Quintana [72] highlighted that the Cohen's guidelines [73] may underestimate the magnitude of small and large effect sizes. Therefore, it is suggested that HRV studies were generally underpowered.…”
Section: Study Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve the goal set in this study, we chose four tasks/activities that, based on preliminary studies [10,19,33], would highlight the influence of workload on haptic perception with the foot. We defined four conditions.…”
Section: Experiments Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%