2002
DOI: 10.1021/ac011235b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical-Overlap Theory of Column Switching in Gas Chromatography:  Applications to Flavor and Fragrance Compounds

Abstract: First-column gas chromatograms (GCs) of hundreds of flavor and fragrance compounds, and second-column GCs of specific regions of these GCs, are predicted using thermodynamic databases in commercial software. A statistical-overlap theory of column switching with cryogenic focusing then is developed by mimicking the predicted GCs by two kinds of Monte Carlo simulations. In the first kind, a probability distribution is calculated for the number of compounds in a region of the first-column GC, based on the number … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 However, MDGC techniques require prior knowledge of the sample mixture, and they result in decreased peak capacity in cases where more than 10 components are transferred from GC1 to GC2. 14 MDGC is appropriate for improving the resolution of a few closely eluting analytes, but is usually poorly suited for complex mixtures with multiple target analytes. Unlike heart-cut MDGC approaches, comprehensive twodimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) separates the entire sample mixture in two dimensions with continuous detection and is thus more suited to nontargeted separation of all components in complex mixtures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 However, MDGC techniques require prior knowledge of the sample mixture, and they result in decreased peak capacity in cases where more than 10 components are transferred from GC1 to GC2. 14 MDGC is appropriate for improving the resolution of a few closely eluting analytes, but is usually poorly suited for complex mixtures with multiple target analytes. Unlike heart-cut MDGC approaches, comprehensive twodimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) separates the entire sample mixture in two dimensions with continuous detection and is thus more suited to nontargeted separation of all components in complex mixtures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, v 2 17 s are insignificant for small mx 0 =X. Indeed, the numbers of peak maxima in traditional gas chromatograms of flavors and fragrances calculated with Pro ez GC have been predicted by SOT for nonpolar [12] and polar phases [13,26], and for columnswitching studies based on both phase types [15]. All these studies corresponded to small mx 0 =X.…”
Section: Comparison Of Theoretical and Pro Ez Gc P(n)smentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Simulation was used, because we do not know how to calculate the SD analytically. Monte Carlo simulations have been used before in point-process SOT [15,16]. As stated previously, an ensemble exists of possible ncolumn separations, all of which statistically resemble the actual one.…”
Section: Calculation Of Singlet Distribution By Montementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical-overlap theory, applied specifically to the MDGC analysis of flavour and fragrance compounds, has recently shown that separation is rarely complete in the second-dimension column in cases where 10 or more peaks are transferred from the first-dimension column as a single refocused heart-cut. 15 The requirements for GC × GC were met by the development of a modulation interface, which was capable of rapidly generating a continuous series of narrow injection bands (or pulses) in the secondary column, and by making the second-column separation fast enough to generate at least one complete chromatogram in the time taken for each single peak to elute from the first column. 16 The retention time window of the fast seconddimension chromatograms in GC × GC is typically less than 5 or 6 s. During the process (elution time) of each second-dimension chromatogram, the modulator accumulates sample for the subsequent delivery of the next injection pulse to the second column.…”
Section: Background To Comprehensive Gcmentioning
confidence: 99%