2013
DOI: 10.1007/s13143-013-0061-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical multisite simulations of summertime precipitation over South Korea and its future change based on observational data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For climate variables, precipitation forecast data are available from the Korea Meteorological Agency (KMA). However, this study applies the research approach used by Kim et al (2013). The problem with the KMA forecasting model ( 2012) is that it significantly underestimates the typical peak of summer precipitation in Korea, thus making future precipitation estimates highly unreliable.…”
Section: Forecasting Future Damage Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For climate variables, precipitation forecast data are available from the Korea Meteorological Agency (KMA). However, this study applies the research approach used by Kim et al (2013). The problem with the KMA forecasting model ( 2012) is that it significantly underestimates the typical peak of summer precipitation in Korea, thus making future precipitation estimates highly unreliable.…”
Section: Forecasting Future Damage Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem with the KMA forecasting model ( 2012) is that it significantly underestimates the typical peak of summer precipitation in Korea, thus making future precipitation estimates highly unreliable. In contrast, the weather generator developed by Kim et al (2013), which uses a cyclostationary empirical orthogonal function (CSEOF) technique, faithfully reproduces the peak summer daily precipitation. Based on the synthetic time series and annually repeating evolution patterns, 100 sets of synthetic summer daily precipitation records for 57 stations from 2013 to 2060 are generated.…”
Section: Forecasting Future Damage Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al 1997;Fyfe et al 1999). EOFs have not been widely applied to weather generators in the past, but cyclostationary EOF analysis was used by Kim et al (2013) to model summer rainfall in Korea. Our model differs from theirs in a number of ways, including: our use of periodically extended EOFs to capture the low-frequency variability of weather variables to overcome the problem of overdispersion; our use of autoregressive models at each individual site, rather than over the whole domain; our integrated approach to the modelling of extremes as opposed to modelling extremes as events always occurring simultaneously over predefined clusters of sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%