1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(98)00068-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical models of brittle deformation: Part II: computer simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, the present MD model applied to low-velocity rigid-anvil simulations by Mastilovic and Krajcinovic (1999) reproduced the Taylor's experimental observations (1948) showing that the relative shortening of the slender projectile (L1/L0) is independent of the slenderness ratio (L0/D0). Also, these MD simulation results are in agreement with the classic analysis, originated by Taylor (and refined by Wilkins and Guinan; e.g., Meyers, 1994), which suggested the scaling relation between the relative projectile shortening and the impact energy , L1/L0 ∝ exp (K).…”
Section: Validation Of the MD Simulation Modelsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Next, the present MD model applied to low-velocity rigid-anvil simulations by Mastilovic and Krajcinovic (1999) reproduced the Taylor's experimental observations (1948) showing that the relative shortening of the slender projectile (L1/L0) is independent of the slenderness ratio (L0/D0). Also, these MD simulation results are in agreement with the classic analysis, originated by Taylor (and refined by Wilkins and Guinan; e.g., Meyers, 1994), which suggested the scaling relation between the relative projectile shortening and the impact energy , L1/L0 ∝ exp (K).…”
Section: Validation Of the MD Simulation Modelsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The dimension of ''GN/m 2 '' reflects the interpretation of the spring constants as stiffness per unit thickness when the thickness is not assigned in computing K e . A Gaussian distribution for the stiffness has been used in the past by Mastilovic for example (Mastilovic and Krajcinovic, 1999) but this paper provides the rationale to ''calculate'' the natural distribution based on the geometry and mechanical property of the microstructure. Furthermore, the ''Central Limit Theorem'' guarantees the robustness of the results even when the sampling distribution of the material axes is not uniform.…”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In damage mechanics, for example, a finite tensile strength is randomly assigned to each spring so that a rupture occurs when the load in the spring reaches the given threshold (Mastilovic and Krajcinovic, 1999;. Unlike the spring stiffness distribution though, the strength distribution is strongly dependent on the manufacturing process and the presence of non-visible defects (<l), such as glassy pockets, voids and second phase precipitates at the grain-boundary, renders any estimate of critical strains from pure geometrical considerations unreliable.…”
Section: Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A lot of attention is paid to the plasticity models in composites in terms of probabilistic mechanics-in macro-scale [3], smaller scales [20] or even in the area of nano-composites [7]. The generalized stochastic perturbation theory [8] is an interesting alternative to the other existing theoretical and computational approaches in stochastic mechanics [14,15,22,23]. The main reason of an introduction of the generalized method is full Taylor expansion including as many probabilistic moments as it is necessary for an accurate solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%