2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-785-9_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Models for Genetic Mapping in Polyploids: Challenges and Opportunities

Abstract: Statistical methods for genetic mapping have well been developed for diploid species but are lagging in the more complex polyploids. The genetic mapping of polyploids, where genome number is higher than two, is complicated by uncertainty about the genotype-phenotype correspondence, inconsistent meiotic mechanisms, heterozygous genome structures, and increased allelic (action) and nonallelic (interaction) combinations. According to their meiotic configurations, polyploids can be classified as bivalent polyploid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical models for QTL mapping have been developed for polyploids with bivalent pairing, taking into account preferential vs . random chromosome pairing behavior by incorporating a preferential pairing factor [37,38]. Molecular marker segregation allows estimating chromosome pairing behavior.…”
Section: Methods For Genome Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical models for QTL mapping have been developed for polyploids with bivalent pairing, taking into account preferential vs . random chromosome pairing behavior by incorporating a preferential pairing factor [37,38]. Molecular marker segregation allows estimating chromosome pairing behavior.…”
Section: Methods For Genome Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, research into its genetics, genomics, and breeding has been limited (Habiyaremye et al, 2017b). Furthermore, genetic analysis of proso millet is also difficult because of its polyploid nature (proso is allopolyploid; 2n = 4x = 36) (Li et al, 2012). However, this crop has received more research attention lately, and availability of genomic information is increasing with access to different genomic resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, more subtle or multiple QTL are difficult to detect using GWAS ( Korte and Farlow 2013 ; Ott et al 2015 ). Similarly, improvements seen by the use of a bi-parental cross in polyploids has been limited by uncertainties around the geno-phenotype correspondence, the partially informative markers determined for this cross, variations in meiotic mechanisms, outcrossing due to heterozygous genomic structure and how allelic and nonallelic combinations increase at an exponential rate with the number of alleles and thus only QTL with a larger effect can be identified ( Li et al 2012 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%