2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical modelling of the whole human femur incorporating geometric and material properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
85
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, accurate reconstruction of bone morphology from MRI is still an issue as it requires at least 1.5-T scanners, which are not usually available in orthopaedic hospitals, and ad hoc acquisition protocols to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the cortical bone [15]. On the other hand, the model reconstruction is not straightforward, but it should be noted that some recent studies on automated methodologies for bone surface reconstruction from CT scans [12,[56][57][58], and even from low-dose digital stereoradiography [59], showed that high accuracy and high speed were achievable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, accurate reconstruction of bone morphology from MRI is still an issue as it requires at least 1.5-T scanners, which are not usually available in orthopaedic hospitals, and ad hoc acquisition protocols to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the cortical bone [15]. On the other hand, the model reconstruction is not straightforward, but it should be noted that some recent studies on automated methodologies for bone surface reconstruction from CT scans [12,[56][57][58], and even from low-dose digital stereoradiography [59], showed that high accuracy and high speed were achievable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early attempts to account for patient variability either manually modelled a small cohort of subjects (Radcliffe and Taylor, 2007;Perillo-Marcone et al, 2004;Lengsfeld et al, 2005) or scaled either the size (Viceconti et al, 2006) and/or the material properties (Viceconti et al, 2006;Wong et al, 2005) of a single femur. An alternative approach to account for patient variability is the use of active shape and active appearance models, which are statistical representations of the morphology and material properties of the bone segment (Taylor et al, 2013;Bryan et al, 2010) or joint . The advantage of active appearance models is that they can be used to generate 100s-1000s of synthetic instances based on a smaller training set of representative bones or joints.…”
Section: Design Of Computer Based Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond shape, population models can include internal femur architecture [17,20], correlations to fracture and disease risk [14,21], mechanical behaviour [22] and anthropological and anthropometric data [5]. These models allow the prediction of femoral structure from correlated data, or vice versa.…”
Section: Population Models and The Musculoskeletal Atlas Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although useful for the classification of normal or pathological gait, the weights obtained from a principal component analysis can also be used to synthetically generate feasible gait data across a larger population than what was originally sampled [27]. This can be useful for assessing the variability in biomechanical parameters across a population and has application to predict femur fracture risk [22] or assess joint replacement designs [27]. Population models might also be used to predict complex form -function relationships of the musculoskeletal system.…”
Section: Population Models and The Musculoskeletal Atlas Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%