2015
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical modeling to characterize relationships between knee anatomy and kinematics

Abstract: The mechanics of the knee are complex and dependent on the shape of the articular surfaces and their relative alignment. Insight into how anatomy relates to kinematics can establish biomechanical norms, support the diagnosis and treatment of various pathologies (e.g. patellar maltracking) and inform implant design. Prior studies have used correlations to identify anatomical measures related to specific motions. The objective of this study was to describe relationships between knee anatomy and tibiofemoral (TF)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(123 reference statements)
5
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While internal/external rotation of the knee may be measured in vivo with conventional motion capture methods and incorporated into the model knee 10 , capturing activity-specific differences in knee translations is more challenging without techniques such as stereo radiography. However, it may be possible to use a principal component approach to leverage relationships between specimen-specific TF/PF kinematics and anatomy 32 . Given subject-specific geometries of femur and tibia, such a technique may allow inference of TF translations in anterior/posterior and superior/inferior directions for a given knee flexion task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While internal/external rotation of the knee may be measured in vivo with conventional motion capture methods and incorporated into the model knee 10 , capturing activity-specific differences in knee translations is more challenging without techniques such as stereo radiography. However, it may be possible to use a principal component approach to leverage relationships between specimen-specific TF/PF kinematics and anatomy 32 . Given subject-specific geometries of femur and tibia, such a technique may allow inference of TF translations in anterior/posterior and superior/inferior directions for a given knee flexion task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have applied SSM to a wide range of applications. Some studies focused on relating geometry to diseases, for instance the risk of developing osteoarthritis (Bredbenner et al, 2010) or geometry to kinematics (Smoger et al, 2015), creating thus a statistical shape–function model. Others considered the study of implant behavior or even optimization of implant designs across the population (see Figure 3) (Belenguer et al, 2006; Kozic et al, 2010).…”
Section: Uncertainty and Variability In Computational Models: Identifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this mesh-morphing approach, Fitzpatrick et al (2011a,b) analyzed the changes in knee kinematics and contact mechanics due to articular alignment. These studies were followed by Rao et al (2013) and Smoger et al (2015) who evaluated and related knee mechanics and kinematics to both shape and alignment variability (Figure 5). Malandrino et al (2015) used a similar approach to morph a generic mesh of lumbar vertebrae to subject-specific geometries and assess the interaction among biomechanical and biophysical processes and intervertebral disc condition.…”
Section: Uncertainty and Variability In Computational Models: Identifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical shape models (SSMs) have become an accepted tool to describe anatomical variation and have characterized the morphology of individual bones and whole joints (Bryan et al, 2010; Yang et al, 2008; Rao et al, 2013; Smoger et al, 2015). SSMs offer an alternative means to obtain the 3D subject-specific bone geometry from stereo-radiographic images, thus avoiding the need for segmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%