2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical modeling of tree failures during storms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results did not show improved predictive performance of the map with the more flexible 579 methods GAM and BRT compared to the logistic regression model (GLM). This is somewhat 580 surprising, especially in the case of BRTs, because several recent studies have shown good 581 performance of random forest for modelling storm disturbances (Albrecht et al, 2019;Hart et 582 al., 2019;Kabir et al, 2018). Yet, in our results BRT did not lead to better predictive 583 performance in cross-validation or with test data, even though it is a tree-based ensemble 584 method very similar to random forest.…”
Section: Comparison Of Methods 572mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results did not show improved predictive performance of the map with the more flexible 579 methods GAM and BRT compared to the logistic regression model (GLM). This is somewhat 580 surprising, especially in the case of BRTs, because several recent studies have shown good 581 performance of random forest for modelling storm disturbances (Albrecht et al, 2019;Hart et 582 al., 2019;Kabir et al, 2018). Yet, in our results BRT did not lead to better predictive 583 performance in cross-validation or with test data, even though it is a tree-based ensemble 584 method very similar to random forest.…”
Section: Comparison Of Methods 572mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, different approaches allowing more flexible model behaviour 81 than fully parametric GLMs have been used, such as generalized additive models (GAM; 82 Schmidt et al, 2010) that use non-parametric smooth functions to allow more flexibility in the 83 relationship of response variable and predictors (Hastie et al, 2009). Machine learning 84 approaches have also been successfully applied to wind disturbance modeling (see 85 Hanewinkel et al 2004 for an early example) and recently especially tree-based ensemble 86 models, such as random forests, have been shown to perform well in predicting wind 87 damage (Albrecht et al, 2019;Hart et al, 2019;Kabir et al, 2018;Schindler et al, 2016). 88…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the comparative analysis results, the proposed square wave-activated WASDNN is more satisfactory than the WASDNN activated by other activation functions and other neural networks. In addition to these models, the proposed model is compared with other classification methods, such as logistic regression and AdaBoost [28]. However, the results are similarly not satisfying and convincing.…”
Section: Analysis On Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 7 lists the data and the corresponding binarizations. By using the C4.5 decision tree [28], the classification results under different attributes are shown in Figure 16, and the information entropy gains of the attributes are calculated and displayed as ''entropy'' in the corresponding nodes. One can see from the figure that using these three factors to classify the presidential parties would generate errors, whereas classifying the results with the proposed WASDNN's predictions would simplify the tree complexity and generate the predictions without errors.…”
Section: Appendix B About Election Prediction Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is mainly divided into shallow network model and deep neural network model. The shallow model mainly includes random forest [11], Bayesian model, ensemble model [12] and artificial neural network, etc, literature [13] proposed a driving risk status prediction method based on Bayesian network prediction model; in literature [14], neural network model is used to predict the nitrogen status of wheat plants. Compared with the conventional gray-world and scale-by-max approaches, the performance of neural network model is better.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%