2022
DOI: 10.1515/cppm-2022-0031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical modeling and optimization of the bleachability of regenerated spent bleaching earth using response surface methodology and artificial neural networks with genetic algorithm

Abstract: In this study, the statistical modeling and optimization of the regeneration of spent bleaching earth (SBE) for re-use in the bleaching of crude palm oil (CPO) oil was examined. Having a good model will assist with the successful optimal regeneration of SBE and hence minimize the environmental pollution associated with its current disposal method which is based on dumping as landfills. The SBE samples were de-oiled with the Soxhlet extraction method, using n-hexane for 1 h at 60 °C; treated at temperatures ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrarily, the most widely used metrics among the numerous model selection techniques are the predicted residual sum of squares (PRESS), the Akaike information criterion (AIC), and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) [ 24 ]. The PRESS measures a model’s propensity to predict; hence, the lower the PRESS score, the greater the model’s prediction [ 25 ]. The PRESS value range in the current study is between 0.0464 and 0.5369, which supports the claim.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrarily, the most widely used metrics among the numerous model selection techniques are the predicted residual sum of squares (PRESS), the Akaike information criterion (AIC), and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) [ 24 ]. The PRESS measures a model’s propensity to predict; hence, the lower the PRESS score, the greater the model’s prediction [ 25 ]. The PRESS value range in the current study is between 0.0464 and 0.5369, which supports the claim.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%