2006 International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies 2006
DOI: 10.1109/iscit.2006.339821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Model RMS Delay Spread in UWB Ground Reflection Channel Based on Peak Power Loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is shown that for short-range transmissions including the wireless sensor networking, the root-mean-square (rms) delay spread is in the range of ns [5] (and ps for UWB applications [6]) which is small compared to the symbol duration Ts=16 ms obtained from the bandwidth B = 1/Ts = 62. 5 To compute the received SNR of each symbol, based on the definition of SNR we have to know the amplitude of the fading channel coefficients and the pathloss.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown that for short-range transmissions including the wireless sensor networking, the root-mean-square (rms) delay spread is in the range of ns [5] (and ps for UWB applications [6]) which is small compared to the symbol duration Ts=16 ms obtained from the bandwidth B = 1/Ts = 62. 5 To compute the received SNR of each symbol, based on the definition of SNR we have to know the amplitude of the fading channel coefficients and the pathloss.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Channel Model: It is shown that for short-range transmissions including the wireless sensor networking, the root mean square (rms) delay spread is in the range of ns [8] (and ps for UWB applications [9]) which is small compared to the symbol duration T s = 16 µs obtained from the bandwidth B = 1 Ts = 62.5 KHz in the IEEE 802.15.4 standard [6, p. 49]. Thus, it is reasonable to expect a flat-fading channel model for WSNs.…”
Section: System Model and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown by Friis [19] that a low transmission power implies a small range. On the other hand, for short-range transmission scenarios, the root mean square (rms) delay spread is in the range of nanoseconds [11] (and picoseconds for UWB applications [20]) which is small compared to symbol durations for modulation schemes. For instance, the channel bandwidth and the correspond symbol duration considered in IEEE 802.15.4 standard are B = 62.5 KHz and T s = 16 µs, respectively [16, p. 49], while the rms delay spread in indoor environments are in the range of 70-150 ns [21].…”
Section: Channel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%