2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2018.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical methods to detect novel genetic variants using publicly available GWAS summary data

Abstract: We propose statistical methods to detect novel genetic variants using only genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data without access to raw genotype and phenotype data. With more and more summary data being posted for public access in the post GWAS era, the proposed methods are practically very useful to identify additional interesting genetic variants and shed lights on the underlying disease mechanism. We illustrate the utility of our proposed methods with application to GWAS meta-analysis results o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared the performance of our proposed method (OWC) with five aforementioned methods: 1) three methods proposed by Guo and Wu (2018a): sum test (ST), squared sum test (S2T), adaptive test (AT), 2) a method proposed by Kwak and Pan (2015): adaptive sum of powered score tests (aSPU), and 3) a method proposed by Li et al (2011): gene-based association test that uses extended Simes procedure (GATES). We briefly introduce each of the methods as follows: following Wu et al (2016).…”
Section: Comparison Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compared the performance of our proposed method (OWC) with five aforementioned methods: 1) three methods proposed by Guo and Wu (2018a): sum test (ST), squared sum test (S2T), adaptive test (AT), 2) a method proposed by Kwak and Pan (2015): adaptive sum of powered score tests (aSPU), and 3) a method proposed by Li et al (2011): gene-based association test that uses extended Simes procedure (GATES). We briefly introduce each of the methods as follows: following Wu et al (2016).…”
Section: Comparison Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, we conducted extensive simulation studies and real data analysis. We compared our method OWC with five existing gene-based methods: gene-based association test that uses extended Simes procedure (GATES) , adaptive sum of powered score tests (aSPU) (Kwak and Pan 2015), and three methods proposed by Guo and Wu (2018a): sum test (ST), squared sum test (S2T), adaptive test (AT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are three types of methods utilizing summary statistics including burden, quadratic and adaptive forms (Pasaniuc and Price, 2017). The three methods proposed by Guo and Wu (2018): sum test (ST), squared sum test (S2T) and adaptive test (AT) are good representative of the three types of methods. Therefore, we compare the performance of the proposed method (GPA) with the three methods.…”
Section: Comparison Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the Venn diagram comparing the number of significant genes identified by the proposed test with Guo and Wu's method. The three methods of Guo and Wu (2018) identified 25 significant genes in total, specifically, the ST identified 12 significant genes, S2T…”
Section: Zipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation