2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71320-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

15
811
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 463 publications
(827 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
15
811
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note also that the terminology of spontaneous emission "rate" only makes sense for a weak or intermediate coupling regime. We stress, however, that the general formalism above rigorously covers both weak and strong coupling regimes in a self-consistent way, naturally recovering phenomena such as vacuum Rabi oscillations and reverse spontaneous emission [40][41][42]. Our expression for the spontaneous emission is also in agreement with derivations from Dung et al [43,44] and Wubs et al [38], who have pioneered many of the general theories of quantized light emission within inhomogeneous materials.…”
Section: Quantum Statistics and Measurement Aspects Of Single Photonssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Note also that the terminology of spontaneous emission "rate" only makes sense for a weak or intermediate coupling regime. We stress, however, that the general formalism above rigorously covers both weak and strong coupling regimes in a self-consistent way, naturally recovering phenomena such as vacuum Rabi oscillations and reverse spontaneous emission [40][41][42]. Our expression for the spontaneous emission is also in agreement with derivations from Dung et al [43,44] and Wubs et al [38], who have pioneered many of the general theories of quantized light emission within inhomogeneous materials.…”
Section: Quantum Statistics and Measurement Aspects Of Single Photonssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…To complement previous approaches based on the pure-state formalism [15,31], we make a direct connection between the squeezing of the atomic dipole and the squeezing of the cavity field, and point at a distinction between the contributions of singlephoton and two-photon excitation processes.…”
Section: Observation Of Squeezed Light From One Atom Excited With Twomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinearity appears at a single-atom and singlephoton level where quantum fluctuations play a major role [5,15] so that its understanding requires a full quantum treatment rather than a simplified linearized approach. In the experiment, the quadrature operator of the light field, X θ , is measured outside the cavity using a homodyne detection with a controllable phase θ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two states, |↓ = |0,0 and |↑ = (|1,0 − LETTERS |0,1 )/ √ 2, form an effective two-level system composed of both transmon and cavity degrees of freedom. Within the effective two-level subspace, the photon operators are mapped 22 to Pauli operators a → Σ − / √ 2, a † → Σ + / √ 2, so that the microwave tone acts as a drive on the effective two-level system, that is,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a scenario that Carmichael and co-workers 12,22 have referred to as 'dressing of dressed states'. The Hamiltonian H eff refers to the frame rotating at the drive frequency, ∆ = ω 01 − g 0 − ω d is the detuning between the drive and the vacuum Rabi peak and Ω = √ 2ξ is the effective drive strength.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%