1977
DOI: 10.1177/030913337700100201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical methods in physical geography

Abstract: This essay presents a state of the art review of statistical applications in physical geography. Initially, methods drawn from traditional statistics based upon classical probability theory are described and evaluated. It is argued that explicitly, or, more usually, implicitly such methods assume independence of the observations in both space and time making it incumbent upon statistical physical geography to reject what one authority has called its former 'timebound preoccupation' (Chorley, 1962, 6) in favou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 200 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stan Gregory not only adopted and adapted his methods but also, and very significantly, stimulated the teaching of rigorous statistical description through a pioneering textbook and promoted it throughout British universities and high schools (Johnston, 2018). As Unwin (1977: 186; 1999: 2) has recorded, those who think thatUK quantitative geography…was all to do with Haggett and Chorley on a supposed ‘Cambridge (Chorley) to Bristol (Haggett) axis’ should note that there was also another axis from Manchester to London with two unsung and largely forgotten influences from climatologists Crowe and Gregory.The counterfactual – without Crowe and Gregory, how might British geography have developed in the 1950s–1960s? – is unanswerable, but there can be no doubt of their importance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stan Gregory not only adopted and adapted his methods but also, and very significantly, stimulated the teaching of rigorous statistical description through a pioneering textbook and promoted it throughout British universities and high schools (Johnston, 2018). As Unwin (1977: 186; 1999: 2) has recorded, those who think thatUK quantitative geography…was all to do with Haggett and Chorley on a supposed ‘Cambridge (Chorley) to Bristol (Haggett) axis’ should note that there was also another axis from Manchester to London with two unsung and largely forgotten influences from climatologists Crowe and Gregory.The counterfactual – without Crowe and Gregory, how might British geography have developed in the 1950s–1960s? – is unanswerable, but there can be no doubt of their importance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%