Social influence effects have been extensively studied in various empirical network research. However, many challenges remain in estimating social influence effects in networks, as influence effects are often entangled with other factors, such as homophily in the selection process and the common social-environmental factors that individuals are embedded in. Methods currently available either do not solve these problems or require stringent assumptions. Recent works by Xu (2018) and others have shown that a latent space adjusted approach based on the latent space model has the potential to disentangle the influence effects from other processes, and the simulation evidence has shown that this approach outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches in terms of recovering the true social influence effect when there is an unobserved trait co-determining influence and selection. In this paper, I will further illustrate how the latent space adjusted approach can account for bias in the estimation of social influence effects and how this approach can be easily implemented in R.Recent works by Xu (2018) and others (Shalizi and McFowland III, 2018) have shown that a latent space adjusted approach based on the latent space model (Hoff et al., 2002) has the potential to disentangle the social influence effects from other processes operating at the same time, and simulation evidence has shown that this approach outperforms some other state-of-the-art methods (e.g., instrumental variable method, structural equation model) in terms of recovering the true social influence effects. In this paper, I will illustrate how the latent space adjusted approach can account for 1 There are also structural constraints such as transitivity and preferential attachment which could cause people to become friends. However, these mechanisms in themselves do not entangle with influence (e.g., one can befriend another having high popularity but different behavior). In these cases, another mechanism must be present to induce similarities between these friends (e.g., selection of common friends based on similarity in attributes), and thus the entanglement goes back to the original three mechanisms, namely influence, selection based on homophily, and social-environmental factors.