2012
DOI: 10.1201/b12126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Methods for Stochastic Differential Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Langevin movement model based on a RSF, as defined in Section 2, the Euler approximation therefore provides explicit estimates and confidence intervals. Note that the Euler estimator is biased due to the approximation made in Equation (see Kessler et al, , Chapter 1). Therefore, both the estimate and the confidence interval must be interpreted with caution, as they depend on the quality of the Euler scheme.…”
Section: Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the Langevin movement model based on a RSF, as defined in Section 2, the Euler approximation therefore provides explicit estimates and confidence intervals. Note that the Euler estimator is biased due to the approximation made in Equation (see Kessler et al, , Chapter 1). Therefore, both the estimate and the confidence interval must be interpreted with caution, as they depend on the quality of the Euler scheme.…”
Section: Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, let T Δ be the (2n) where E is a 2n-vector of independent N(0, γ 2 ) variables, and where ν = γ 2 β. The estimators for ν and γ 2 are derived from standard lin- Kessler et al, 2012, Chapter 1). Therefore, both the estimate and the confidence interval must be interpreted with caution, as they depend on the quality of the Euler scheme.…”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various statistical methods have been proposed to perform maximum likelihood estimation with unknown transition densities (see Iacus () and Kessler et al . ()). The most convenient procedures to estimate discretely observed diffusion processes rely on discretization schemes to approximate the SDE between two observations and use a surrogate of the likelihood function to compute an approximate maximum likelihood estimator of η .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…More recently, Kessler (), Kessler et al . () and Uchida and Yoshida () introduced another Gaussian‐based approximation of the transition density between two consecutive observations by using higher order expansions of the conditional mean and variance of an observation given the observation at the previous time step. Another approach to approximate the likelihood of the observations based on Hermite polynomials expansion was introduced by Ait‐Sahalia () and extended in several directions recently; see Li () and all the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, they account for model uncertainty or environmental fluctuations by their inherent stochasticity. Lastly, they remedy the otherwise omnipresent issue of the inconsistent drift estimator (Kessler et al ., ) in plain SDEs (only fixed effects), when the observation time horizon is finite, because the mixed effects approach facilitates pooling of data across subjects, which leads to unbiasedness of the drift estimator as the number of subjects approaches ∞.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%