Statistical methods for estimating doubling time in in vitro cell growth

Abstract

Doubling time has been widely used to represent the growth pattern of cells. A traditional method for finding the doubling time is to apply gray-scaled cells, where the logarithmic transformed scale is used. As an alternative statistical method, the log-linear model was recently proposed, for which actual cell numbers are used instead of the transformed gray-scaled cells. In this paper, I extend the log-linear model and propose the extended log-linear model. This model is designed for extra-Poisson variation, where the log-linear model produces the less appropriate estimate of the doubling time. Moreover, I compare statistical properties of the gray-scaled method, the log-linear model, and the extended log-linear model. For this purpose, I perform a Monte Carlo simulation study with three data-generating models: the additive error model, the multiplicative error model, and the overdispersed Poisson model. From the simulation study, I found that the gray-scaled method highly depends on the normality assumption of the gray-scaled cells; hence, this method is appropriate when the error model is multiplicative with the log-normally distributed errors. However, it is less efficient for other types of error distributions, especially when the error model is additive or the errors follow the Poisson distribution. The estimated standard error for the doubling time is not accurate in this case. The log-linear model was found to be efficient when the errors follow the Poisson distribution or nearly Poisson distribution. The efficiency of the log-linear model was decreased accordingly as the overdispersion increased, compared to the extended log-linear model. When the error model is additive or multiplicative with Gamma-distributed errors, the log-linear model is more efficient than the gray-scaled method. The extended log-linear model performs well overall for all three data-generating models. The loss of efficiency of the extended log-linear model is observed only when the error model is multiplicative with log-normally distributed errors, where the gray-scaled method is appropriate. However, the extended log-linear model is more efficient than log-linear model in this case.

Sentinel Event Surveillance to Estimate Total Sars-CoV-2 Infections, United States

“…The epidemic doubling time was taken from previous work which estimated from data on the outbreak in Wuhan, China. This doubling time from the Wuhan data was estimated to be 6.4 days, (95 CrI 5.8–7.1), and we used a lognormal distribution for D following literature values for other doubling times [5, 6].…”

“…The doubling time of the disease was taken from previous work using data on the outbreak in Wuhan, China, and was estimated to be 6.4 days, (95 CrI 5.8–7.1) and lognormally distributed [5, 6] …”

Radioresistant human lung adenocarcinoma cells that survived multiple fractions of ionizing radiation are sensitive to HSP90 inhibition

“…A simple linear regression model was built for log (cell number per well) for each cell group, using the measurement time as a continuous explanatory variable. For each cell group, the estimate of cell doubling time (dt) was calculated based on the slope of regression line (β) using the formula dt = log2/β, and its standard error was also calculated, based on the formula: SE(dt) = log(2)*SE(β)/β2 [ 80 ]. The comparison of doubling times between cells groups was performed using z -tests, based on these estimated values and their standard errors.…”

Development of a Functional Schwann Cell Phenotype from Autologous Porcine Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells for Nerve Repair

“…The blank wells were subtracted from the test samples and the proliferation results graphed and expressed as the change in relative fluorescent units (RFUs) over time. Doubling time was calculated according to previously published methods [36] using the linear portion on the exponential part of the growth cure and the formula DT = ((T2 − T1)*log⁡(2)/log⁡(A2/A1)), where DT: doubling time, T2-T1: time period, and A2 and A1 the absorbance's at T2 and T1, respectively.…”