1995
DOI: 10.1086/230638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Methods for Comparing Regression Coefficients Between Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
1,069
2
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,700 publications
(1,121 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
10
1,069
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…We estimated gender-stratified models and tested the equality of regression coefficients to determine statistically significant gender differences in the parameter estimates (Clogg et al, 1995). Consistent with prior studies (Antonucci and Akiyama, 1987;Umberson et al, 1996), non-spousal social support and marital quality were associated with loneliness in different ways for women and men.…”
Section: Multivariate Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We estimated gender-stratified models and tested the equality of regression coefficients to determine statistically significant gender differences in the parameter estimates (Clogg et al, 1995). Consistent with prior studies (Antonucci and Akiyama, 1987;Umberson et al, 1996), non-spousal social support and marital quality were associated with loneliness in different ways for women and men.…”
Section: Multivariate Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…To do this, we stratified by gender and re-estimated the previous models. We tested for significant differences between the estimated effects for women and men using a t-test for equality of regression coefficients (Clogg et al, 1995). All estimates were weighted to account for differential probabilities of selection and differential non-response.…”
Section: Household Incomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we were interested in the differences between males and females, we estimated the models for females and males separately. To test whether the odds ratios in the model for men and the model for women are significantly different, we use seemingly unrelated estimations of the two models (Clogg et al 1995;Weesie 1999). With this procedure, the coefficients and standard errors of the two models are estimated simultaneously.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results in models 5-7 are produced on a 30% random subsample of our primary analytical sample. 16 To formally compare coefficients across quartile groups, we calculate z-scores according to the approach described for large samples in Clogg et al (1995), as follows:…”
Section: Who Benefits From Spillovers From Immigrant Diversity?mentioning
confidence: 99%