2011
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical issues in the use of dynamic allocation methods for balancing baseline covariates

Abstract: Background:The procedure for allocating patients to a treatment arm in comparative clinical trials is frequently chosen with only minor deliberation. This decision may, however, ultimately impact the trial inference, credibility, and even validity of the trial analysis. Cancer researchers are increasingly using dynamic allocation (DA) procedures, which balance treatment arms across baseline prognostic factors for clinical trials in place of historical methods such as simple randomisation or allocation via the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, we used minimization, a dynamic allocation method that can balance known prognostic factors between treatment groups. The minimization method is gaining popularity, however, considerable controversy exists over its proper application because it might not be taken as a truly random method . Therefore, we confirmed the robustness of the primary analysis by the sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Third, we used minimization, a dynamic allocation method that can balance known prognostic factors between treatment groups. The minimization method is gaining popularity, however, considerable controversy exists over its proper application because it might not be taken as a truly random method . Therefore, we confirmed the robustness of the primary analysis by the sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Consequently, it is difficult to verify that the ANCOVA model is correctly specified. Re‐randomization‐based inference that follows the ‘analyze as you randomize’ principle provides an attractive alternative to standard analysis and protects against model mis‐specification . Simon first proposed the re‐randomization test for inference under minimization.…”
Section: Continuous Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, matching should not introduce loss of statistical power even when performed on irrelevant covariates 34 . Since purely deterministic allocation methods have been criticized for the risk of introducing experimental biases due to, for instance, the lack of masking 36 , our constrained randomization procedure incorporated also a stochastic component, making it fully compatible with the current clinical recommendations of random allocation and balancing at baseline. The matching-based randomization approach refines all possible allocations from a single pool of individuals, and then randomly picks one of these most feasible allocation solutions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%