1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf01290345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical issues in the 17-keV neutrino experiments

Abstract: Abstract. The 17-keV neutrino experiments are reviewed, and the crucial question of observability in the presence of unknown distortions is addressed. Criteria are listed to narrow the field of acceptable experiments. Using the latest results, I prove that criticism to the negative experiments has been addressed convincingly, and that likely the kinks seen are not attributable to/? decay.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The endpoint, 231.37 +0.10keV could be compared with the value of 231.7 _+ 0.7 keV listed by Wapstra and Audi [10] and the value of 231.6 _+ 0.3 keV recently listed in the 1993 Atomic Mass Evaluation [11]. Our value differs from the value of 231.0 keV obtained by Wietfeldt et al [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] (the uncertainty of QEc is not given in [7]). …”
Section: Decay Energymentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The endpoint, 231.37 +0.10keV could be compared with the value of 231.7 _+ 0.7 keV listed by Wapstra and Audi [10] and the value of 231.6 _+ 0.3 keV recently listed in the 1993 Atomic Mass Evaluation [11]. Our value differs from the value of 231.0 keV obtained by Wietfeldt et al [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] (the uncertainty of QEc is not given in [7]). …”
Section: Decay Energymentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The experiments since 1985 fall into two categories, characterized by how the energies of the decay electrons are measured: magnetic spectrometer or solid-state detector. All the evidence for a 17-keV neutrino has come from experiments that employed solid-state detectors; no positive results have been obtained with magnetic spectrometers (for review see [2][3][4]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"It is therefore difficult to see how these experiments can rule out a 1 % effect, which requires an accuracy of perhaps 0.2% over the analyzed region" (Simpson, 1992, p. 598). 43 Simpson's view of the early negative magnetic spectrometer results was strongly supported by Bonvicini's work [published first as a 1992 CERN report (CERN-PPE/92-54) and later as Bonvicini (1993)]. 44 In this work Bonvicini discussed the question of whether a kink in the energy spectrum due to an admixture of a 17-keV neutrino could be masked by the presence of unknown distortions, such as the shape-correction factors used in magnetic spectrometer experiments.…”
Section: A the Tide Ebbsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A second summary appeared inMorrison (1992b).37 Bonvicini (1993) also considered tritium experiments to be too limited statistically.Rev. Mod.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent work by Bonvicini [19] looked at the correlation between arbitrary shape corrections and a heavy neutrino signal, but failed to infer the importance of the difference in end point between the null and the positive fits for the HJ91 data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%