2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ntt.2007.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical issues and techniques appropriate for developmental neurotoxicity testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After standardization of litters (culling), equal numbers of male and female pups were taken for each experiment, and pups from different litters were independent subjects. 52 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After standardization of litters (culling), equal numbers of male and female pups were taken for each experiment, and pups from different litters were independent subjects. 52 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment, sex and time, as well as significant interactions (e.g. treatment*age, treatment*sex) were treated as fixed effects, and dam was treated as a random effect to control for litter effects as appropriate (Holson et al, 2008). Repeated measurements over time for each pup were analyzed using the compound symmetry covariance structure or the autoregressive-1 (AR(1)) covariance structure, whichever was appropriate.…”
Section: Developmental Behavioral Phenotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The random effect of litter within treatment (N = 28) was also evaluated [38] and found significant, but not taken into account because of the high number of litters within each treatment group would increase the risk of type II error for the effect of treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%