2018
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-018-1278-9
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical filtering of useful concrete creep data from imperfect laboratory tests

Abstract: The reporting and evaluation of creep tests of concrete is complicated by the fact that creep is significant even for the shortest observable load durations. Compared to the strain after 0.1 s load duration, the strain at 2 h duration is typically 53% greater. Most experimenters have for decades been unaware of this fact. Consequently, the reported creep curves require correction by a time shift, which ranges from 0 to 2 h. This further implies a vertical shift of entire creep curve, important for all times up… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the unfortunate ingrained habit of engineers to plot the test results in the linear time scale [9], it has been widely believed that the autogenous shrinkage reaches an upper bound within a few months. But data plots in the logarithmic time scale reveal that the hydration, and thus also the autogenous shrinkage, continues for decades, with no bound in sight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the unfortunate ingrained habit of engineers to plot the test results in the linear time scale [9], it has been widely believed that the autogenous shrinkage reaches an upper bound within a few months. But data plots in the logarithmic time scale reveal that the hydration, and thus also the autogenous shrinkage, continues for decades, with no bound in sight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of creep is usually high in the early stages of loading and decreases with time, but it does not increase again after that [7]. While some recovery occurs when the sustained load is removed, the concrete usually does not return to its original state, and its elastic recovery and creep recovery effects are less than the deformation induced under a load [8,9].…”
Section: A Significance Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they do not suffice for predicting the autogenous shrinkage. The reason is that the autogenous shrinkage is highly sensitive to an initial decrease of relative humidity, and a small error in predicting the self-desiccation and hydration can cause a large error in predicting the autogenous shrinkage Rasoolinejad et al 2018). To avoid major errors, the complete hydration model must be used for that purpose.…”
Section: Hydration Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%