The design of inorganic
materials for various applications critically
depends on our ability to manipulate their synthesis in a rational,
robust, and controllable fashion. Different from the conventional
trial-and-error approach, data-driven techniques such as the design
of experiments (DoE) and machine learning are an effective and more
efficient way to predictably control materials synthesis. Here, we
present a Viewpoint on recent progress in leveraging such techniques
for predicting and controlling the outcomes of inorganic materials
synthesis. We first compare how the design choice (statistical DoE
vs machine learning) affects the type of control it can offer over
the resulting product attributes, information elucidated, and experimental
cost. These attributes are supported by discussing select case studies
from the recent literature that highlight the power of these techniques
for materials synthesis. The influence of experimental bias is next
discussed, followed finally by our perspectives on the major challenges
in the widespread implementation of predictable and controllable materials
synthesis using data-driven techniques.