2007
DOI: 10.2175/106143006x102051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Evaluation of the Influence of Flow Conditions and Sampling Techniques on Water Quality Data

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to statistically evaluate the influence of various sampling methodologies and flow conditions on the quality and comparability of total phosphorus concentration data collected over the course of 27 months at the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) S-65E structure. The data was obtained from the following sampling methodologies: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (Reston, Virginia) equal width increment spatially composite grab samples, USGS replicate samples, SFWMD grab samp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The representativeness of sampling also has limitations, for instance, grab samples may not be fully representative of the entire cross-section of a stream (Martin et al, 1992;Daas et al, 2007). In addition, errors in flow measurement are acknowledged but not quantified (e.g.…”
Section: Uncertainty Of Measured Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The representativeness of sampling also has limitations, for instance, grab samples may not be fully representative of the entire cross-section of a stream (Martin et al, 1992;Daas et al, 2007). In addition, errors in flow measurement are acknowledged but not quantified (e.g.…”
Section: Uncertainty Of Measured Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical assessment of water quality data at the S‐65E structure indicated significant differences and inconsistency in nutrient concentrations ( Daas et al, 2007 ). The evaluation showed that currently used water sampling techniques are inadequate because of deficiencies in functionality and sensitivity to flow conditions at the structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%