2000
DOI: 10.1214/aos/1015957469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical estimation for multiplicative cascades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
45
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 shows log-log plots of the empirical moments E (Q max ) q (points) of the standardized discharge maxima inside each group, as a function of the average areaĀ of the grouped catchments, for different moment orders q = 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3. The reason why we limit our analysis to moment orders q ≤ 3, is because for highly variable random fields (as is the case of discharge maxima), higher moment orders are underestimated with high probability see e.g., [32,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53].…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 4 shows log-log plots of the empirical moments E (Q max ) q (points) of the standardized discharge maxima inside each group, as a function of the average areaĀ of the grouped catchments, for different moment orders q = 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3. The reason why we limit our analysis to moment orders q ≤ 3, is because for highly variable random fields (as is the case of discharge maxima), higher moment orders are underestimated with high probability see e.g., [32,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53].…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 shows log-log plots of the empirical moments [( ′ ) ] (points) of the standardized discharge maxima inside each group, as a function of the average area Ā of the grouped catchments, for different moment orders = 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3. The reason why we limit our analysis to moment orders  3, is because for highly variable random fields (as is the case of discharge maxima), higher moment orders are underestimated with high probability see e.g., [32,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. Similar to the findings of previous studies see e.g., [4,[8][9][10][11]14,19,28,40], one sees that for all moment orders considered, the initial moments of the standardized discharge maxima ′ vary log-linearly with the drainage area A (see least-squares (LS) fitted lines), with negative slopes corresponding to the empirical moment scaling function ( ) in Equation (4).…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper warns practitioners against the blind use in geophysical time series analyses of classical statistical tools, which neglect dependence and heavy tails in distributions. Ossiander and Waymire (2000) already caution against using high moments in multifractal estimation, but their particular focus is on discrete multiplicative cascade models. Indeed, they demonstrate that the estimators of multiscaling exponents converge almost surely to the structure function of the cascade generators as the sample becomes large for all moment orders within a certain critical interval, whose upper bound is consistent with our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cascades have been the paradigm for multifractal objects [38][39][40][41]. In this study, we consider the lattice multiplicative random cascade x(t) given by the product of a set of iid processes varying over a range of different time scales:…”
Section: Vt Of Lmrcmentioning
confidence: 99%