2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-012-0464-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical downscaling of daily climate variables for climate change impact assessment over New South Wales, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observed monthly precipitation and temperatures from meteorological stations of the study area for 1971–2000 were used for comparison of the downscaled climate models. GCMs data on the coarse resolution grids were spatially interpolated to each station using the inverse distance weighted, IDW, method using four native neighbors and Eq. .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observed monthly precipitation and temperatures from meteorological stations of the study area for 1971–2000 were used for comparison of the downscaled climate models. GCMs data on the coarse resolution grids were spatially interpolated to each station using the inverse distance weighted, IDW, method using four native neighbors and Eq. .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future time series of daily temperature, precipitation and solar radiation data for the study area were statistically downscaled from monthly gridded climate data (with the resolution of 2°×2.5°) obtained from the GISS-E2-H-CC (GE2) global circulation model (GCM), using NWAI-WG downscaling model (Liu and Zuo 2012). The spatial inverse distance-weighted (IDW) interpolation method was used to downscale gridded monthly data to sites, followed by biascorrection using qq-plotting approach by comparing observed and the GCM projected data for the period of 1960-1999.…”
Section: Future Climate Change Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason and because we use only one GCM, we compare our results to regional predictions from the recently released Southwest Climate Assessment (Garfin et al 2013) to show that our choice is reasonable for this purpose (see Supplementary Online Material Table S1). Because the coarse resolution of CGCM2 (3.75°×3.75°) is inappropriate for predictions at regional and local scales where assessment and societal response to change is needed (Forbes et al 2011;Xu 1999), we used statistical downscaling (Liu and Zuo 2012;Wilby et al 2002) to generate input for our hydrologic model.…”
Section: Deriving Scenarios Of Future Climate and Downscalingmentioning
confidence: 99%