1934
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1934.00021962002600050008x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Determination of Barley Varietal Adaptation1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that there is a single observation for each variety/location/year combination representing the total barley yield for that combination. These data were first introduced by Immer, Hayes, and Powers (1934), and variations of this dataset have been used by Fisher (1971), Cleveland (1993), and Venables and Ripley (2002).…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that there is a single observation for each variety/location/year combination representing the total barley yield for that combination. These data were first introduced by Immer, Hayes, and Powers (1934), and variations of this dataset have been used by Fisher (1971), Cleveland (1993), and Venables and Ripley (2002).…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various workers (e.g. Immer, Hayes, andPowers (1934), Salmon (1951), Homer and Frey (1957), and Sandison and Bartlett (1958) have discussed some of the methods and problems of comparing varietal performance in several environments for several years. In their work, the variety x location or variety x season interactions were the basic measures of adaptability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes, observable as genotype x environment interactions in a biometrical analysis, have long been recognised as an important source of phenotypic variation (Immer, Hayes and Powers, 1934;Yates and Cochran, 1938;Mather, 1949). Little is known of the inheritance and physiology of these changes, but it has been found empirically that a linear relation frequently exists between phenotype and environment when the latter is measured by its effect on the character under study (Finlay and Wilkinson, 1963;Eberhart and Russell, 1966;Perkins and Jinks, 1968;Breese, 1969).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%