2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.3470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Considerations for Meta-analysis of Diabetic Retinopathy Prevalence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32,33 To verify the results of the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine analysis and to control for sampling error and bias, an exploratory analysis was also conducted using the random intercept mixed-effects logistic regression model, recognizing that the model does not account for study weights. 34 In addition to 95% CIs, we also estimated 95% prediction intervals (PIs) to assess the possible range of new values in the present study. 35 Both inconsistency index (I 2 statistic) and χ 2 P values were used to quantify heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…32,33 To verify the results of the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine analysis and to control for sampling error and bias, an exploratory analysis was also conducted using the random intercept mixed-effects logistic regression model, recognizing that the model does not account for study weights. 34 In addition to 95% CIs, we also estimated 95% prediction intervals (PIs) to assess the possible range of new values in the present study. 35 Both inconsistency index (I 2 statistic) and χ 2 P values were used to quantify heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcome was the global pooled prevalence (with 95% CI) of DR. We conducted the meta-analysis with prevalence estimates transformed using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine method to prevent the need to stabilize variances because some studies reported prevalence rates of 0%, and we transformed the results back to prevalence estimates for interpretation . To verify the results of the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine analysis and to control for sampling error and bias, an exploratory analysis was also conducted using the random intercept mixed-effects logistic regression model, recognizing that the model does not account for study weights . In addition to 95% CIs, we also estimated 95% prediction intervals (PIs) to assess the possible range of new values in the present study .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The IRIS Registry data collection methods have been described previously. 2 We used a database version frozen on December 20, 2021, and accessed on March 30, 2022.…”
Section: Conflict Of Interest Disclosures: Dr Lim Reported Grants Fro...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Therefore, as an exercise, we have repeated our meta-analyses using GLMM methods and present the outcomes from both the (published) FTT and GLMM methods with the inclusion of prediction intervals, as suggested by Zhou and Shen. 2 Methods | Detailed methodology around study selection and statistical methods has been described in our original article. 1 In addition, here, the Stata IC (Stata Corp) version 15.1 additional module command metapreg 5 was used to construct random intercept logistic regression models (a relevant GLMM, as described by Stijnen et al 6 ) for the metaanalytic outcomes of interest published previously.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%