Statistical connectivity provides a sufficient foundation for specific functional connectivity in neocortical neural microcircuits

Abstract

It is well-established that synapse formation involves highly selective chemospecific mechanisms, but how neuron arbors are positioned before synapse formation remains unclear. Using 3D reconstructions of 298 neocortical cells of different types (including nest basket, small basket, large basket, bitufted, pyramidal, and Martinotti cells), we constructed a structural model of a cortical microcircuit, in which cells of different types were independently and randomly placed. We compared the positions of physical appositions resulting from the incidental overlap of axonal and dendritic arbors in the model (statistical structural connectivity) with the positions of putative functional synapses (functional synaptic connectivity) in 90 synaptic connections reconstructed from cortical slice preparations. Overall, we found that statistical connectivity predicted an average of 74 ± 2.7% (mean ± SEM) synapse location distributions for nine types of cortical connections. This finding suggests that chemospecific attractive and repulsive mechanisms generally do not result in pairwise-specific connectivity. In some cases, however, the predicted distributions do not match precisely, indicating that chemospecific steering and aligning of the arbors may occur for some types of connections. This finding suggests that random alignment of axonal and dendritic arbors provides a sufficient foundation for specific functional connectivity to emerge in local neural microcircuits.connectome | microcircuitry | neocortex | neuronal connectivity D uring development, a broad range of molecular signaling mechanisms act to form the neocortical layers (1, 2), lay down guidance tracts for neurons to position themselves and grow their axonal and dendritic arbors (3, 4), shape the morphologies of different types of neurons (5), guide input axons to specific layers (6), trigger differentiation and clustered arborizations of axonal arbors (7), prune axonal arbors in an activitydependent manner (8), guide axonal growth along the axon initial segment (9), and selectively form synapses between specific types of neurons (10-12). Molecular mechanisms also contribute to the activity-triggered formation of synapses between specific pairs of neurons (13). The mechanisms determining this selective connectivity have been a subject of active debate for over a century (3,(14)(15)(16)(17), with proposals ranging from the idea of "chemical relations" between connected neurons in the work by Langley (18) to the "chemoaffinity hypothesis" (the idea that precise synaptic positioning is specified by "highly specific cytochemical affinities" between neurons) in the work by Sperry (19). The result is an intriguing map of synaptic connections between all neurons and specific types of neurons, commonly called the connectome. How the connectome arises is still debated (20). A question that is at the core of the debate is to what extent do chemospecific mechanisms specifically align neuronal arbors between neurons before synaptic connections are formed.Spines are dynamic s...

Causal Mathematical Logic as a guiding framework for the prediction of “Intelligence Signals” in brain simulations

“…The blue brain column modeling has simulated the result that neurons connect by a growth pattern where they are pushing into each other (Hill et al, 2012). This is consistent with the results from the brain on a dish experiments Potter et al, 2004), and the "greedy growth" principle for neurons (Cuntz et al, 2010(Cuntz et al, , 2012, where dendrites branch into space with optimally short wiring refining the concept of a precise computational law for neurons.…”

Analogical Mapping with Sparse Distributed Memory: A Simple Model that Learns to Generalize from Examples

“…In our perspective, low-level structured inputs from sensors need to be preprocessed with other methods, such as methods for invariant feature extraction. There are good reasons to operate with random representations at the higher cognitive level [20,26], and this is a typical prerequisite of VSAs.…”

Cellular organization of cortical barrel columns is whisker-specific

“…Similar spatial extents of functional cortical columns in the horizontal plane, combined with the idea of cortical uniformity, resulted in the notion that a stereotypic columnar network may also represent the elementary structural building block of sensory cortices (9). In combination, the two concepts thus suggested a common organization of all sensory cortices, which led to reverse engineering and simulation efforts that build up large-scale network models of repeatedly occurring identical cortical circuits (10,11).…”