1998
DOI: 10.1029/98rs01889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical characterization of time variability in midlatitude single‐tone HF channel response

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, a statistical analysis approach is proposed to characterize the variability of HF channel response to single-tone signals by using only the amplitude information of the received signal. By the proposed methodology, robust estimates of the time-varying mean and variance of the channel response can be obtained. For this purpose, we use sliding window statistics of the available data. On the basis of the estimated variance of the obtained results, a detailed justification of the proper wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference [7] proposes a statistical analysis method to obtain the statistical characterization of the time variability of a HF channel response. The method employs sliding window statistical analysis to estimate the time-varying first order (mean) and second order (variance) moments of the channel response.…”
Section: Estimation Of Wss Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reference [7] proposes a statistical analysis method to obtain the statistical characterization of the time variability of a HF channel response. The method employs sliding window statistical analysis to estimate the time-varying first order (mean) and second order (variance) moments of the channel response.…”
Section: Estimation Of Wss Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the TUP of a time-varying process is chosen as the local WSS period, there will be no significant variation during the TUP, and the significant changes will be observed in time intervals that having the same scale with the TUP. In [7], a statistical analysis approach is proposed to obtain the statistical characterization of the time variability of a HF channel response. The method employs sliding window statistical analysis to estimate the time-varying mean and variance in order to capture the temporal variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above state‐space model, h n can vary within a pulse interval. However, in HF applications the time variation of the channel response can be safely modeled to vary on a pulse‐to‐pulse basis [ Arikan and Erol , 1998]. Under this assumption, we can obtain the following simplified model where variations in h is modelled to take place from pulse‐to‐pulse, where the impulse response of the ionosphere is allowed to vary according to u p , a predefined time variation on h p as where the subscript p denotes the p th pulse.…”
Section: Estimation Of Baseband Channel Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this initialization procedure, the Kalman Filter can operate with an initial estimate which minimizes the error between the actual channel and the estimated impulse response, provided that the channel is slowly varying at least for couple of pulses used in the initialization. This assumption seems to be valid for midlatitude links whose wide sense stationarity period is found to be in the order of 20 s [ Arikan and Erol , 1998]. This delay in estimation causes the first channel estimate to be available only after first LM samples length of channel impulse response.…”
Section: Estimation Of Baseband Channel Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the WSS period is chosen as the TUP, then significant variations of the regional ionosphere can be captured. In the work of Arikan and Erol [1998], an efficient tool is developed to obtain the statistical characterization of the time variability of HF channel response. The method employs sliding window statistical analysis to estimate the time‐varying mean and variance to capture the temporal variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%