“…Until now, the impact of a variety of parameters on the iSHM simulation results has been investigated so far such as the topology length, the interconnections between branches / main lines, branch lengths, distances between branches, branch terminations and channel attenuation measurement differences between the theoretical and practical results due to the real operation conditions [8], [18], [19]. Apart from the impact of the aforementioned intrinsic parameters, critical events during the operation of power grids, such as branch line faults and hook-style energy thefts, can be detected even if real operation conditions occur by exploiting the class maps footprints of iSHM [20], [21]; here, it should be reminded that a class map is a 2D contour plot that: (i) graphically classifies real and virtual BPL topologies in terms of their CASD Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE) parameter pairs and capacity; (ii) illustrates the borders between the BPL topology classes; and (iii) corresponds each CASD MLE parameter pair to its BPL topology subclass average capacity for given power grid type, CASD, coupling scheme, Injected Power Spectral Density Limits (IPSD) limits and noise Power Spectral Density (PSD) levels; while class map footprints are the graphical correspondence of CASD MLE parameter pair with the capacity that are represented on the class maps and may assess the impact of the intrinsic parameter change or the existence of critical events during the power grid operations. As the OV LV BPL topologies are examined in this paper, when changes of intrinsic parameters or the aforementioned critical events occur the respective CASD MLE parameters of the modified OV LV BPL topologies tend to change their iSHM footprint locations on the class maps following patterns of the same capacity behavior as presented in [20], [22].…”