2023
DOI: 10.3390/su15032049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Assessment on Student Engagement in Asynchronous Online Learning Using the k-Means Clustering Algorithm

Abstract: In this study, statistical assessment was performed on student engagement in online learning using the k-means clustering algorithm, and their differences in attendance, assignment completion, discussion participation and perceived learning outcome were examined. In the clustering process, three features such as the behavioral, emotional and cognitive aspects of student engagement were considered. Data for this study were collected from undergraduate students who enrolled in an asynchronous online course provi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…K-Means clustering algorithm has gained popularity in a variety of fields, including big data analysis (Tao et al, 2016), environmental studies (Xiaojie et al, 2015), social studies (Ding et al, 2013), and power generation (Alkilany et al, 2014). K-means have been frequently used in the learning analytics community as well to classify students into groups with similar characteristics (Chang et al, 2020;Kim, Cho, et al, 2023;Moubayed et al, 2020). Clustering may serve as the foundation for recommendations that may later be made to these students based on their cluster.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K-Means clustering algorithm has gained popularity in a variety of fields, including big data analysis (Tao et al, 2016), environmental studies (Xiaojie et al, 2015), social studies (Ding et al, 2013), and power generation (Alkilany et al, 2014). K-means have been frequently used in the learning analytics community as well to classify students into groups with similar characteristics (Chang et al, 2020;Kim, Cho, et al, 2023;Moubayed et al, 2020). Clustering may serve as the foundation for recommendations that may later be made to these students based on their cluster.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Current [36] emphasized the need for feedback in formative assessments to evaluate teaching and learning systems, while Geletu [37] found that teacher participation positively affects students' learning engagement in science. Ma and Luo [38] demonstrated that engaging in student and peer assessment can positively impact learning performance, and Kim et al [39] showed that clustering algorithms could effectively assess student engagement in asynchronous online learning. Ndihokubwayo et al [40] and Petričević et al [41] also found that active learning environments and contextual and individual factors can influence student engagement in physics.…”
Section: Student Engagement In Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to build students' autonomy are often reciprocated by greater enthusiasm from learners, such as asking questions out of sheer interest [7] rather than gaining bonus grades from the instructor. Moreover, pedagogical strategies such as peer feedback, group discussions, and ice-breaking often help to facilitate peer interaction [67] .…”
Section: Relation Between Teacher Support and Students' Behavioral En...mentioning
confidence: 99%