2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2012.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical assessment and modeling of the effects of weather conditions on H2S plume dispersal from Icelandic geothermal power plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is especially true for H 2 S, where concentrations of H 2 S depend on various meteorological factors. 5 40 Many calculations performed in the present study may give rise to concern due to multiple comparisons; however, it has been argued that no adjustments are needed for these. 41 The increased risk seemed to be restricted to the oldest in the population and the data consisted of those 18 years of age and older, limiting the generalisability of the results with regard to age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This is especially true for H 2 S, where concentrations of H 2 S depend on various meteorological factors. 5 40 Many calculations performed in the present study may give rise to concern due to multiple comparisons; however, it has been argued that no adjustments are needed for these. 41 The increased risk seemed to be restricted to the oldest in the population and the data consisted of those 18 years of age and older, limiting the generalisability of the results with regard to age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…1). Notice that although a fluid coming from deep underground geothermal systems typically contains dissolved gases (such as H2S (Thorsteinsson et al, 2013)), silica (Sugita et al, 2003) and calcite (Hébert et al, 2010), it is assumed in this paper that its properties may be approximated as equal to those of pure water, which is in line with recent literature (e.g., Jalilinasrabady et al, 2012;Pambudi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Double-flash Reference Designmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…To estimate H 2 S exposure through 2007 to July 2014 in different sections of the Reykjavik capital area, a simple model was applied whereas the modelled concentration only depends on wind speed, the angle between wind direction and modelled location, and incoming solar radiation. The width of the plume was determined from measurements and calculations using the well known Gaussian plume, Pasquill-Gifford model [ 29 , 30 ], at 25 km from the source under stable conditions [ 31 ]. The model predicted H 2 S concentrations that were compared to measured concentrations at measurement stations operated by EAI, in section A (Hvaleyrarholt station, HEH) and in section C (GRE) ( Fig 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model predicted H 2 S concentrations that were compared to measured concentrations at measurement stations operated by EAI, in section A (Hvaleyrarholt station, HEH) and in section C (GRE) ( Fig 1 ). Emissions from the Nesjavellir power plant were not included in the model, as the power plant is behind a mountain [ 31 ], which limits the distribution of H 2 S westward in the direction of the Reykjavik capital area [ 26 , 27 , 32 ], and this was confirmed by H 2 S measurement at GRE before the start of the Hellisheidi geothermal power plant in 2006 [ 16 ]. The model covers a 50° section from Hellisheidi power plant to the west, which includes the Reykjavik capital area.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation